Current:Home > NewsNorth Dakota’s abortion ban will remain on hold during court appeal -ChatGPT 說:
North Dakota’s abortion ban will remain on hold during court appeal
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:13:16
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota won’t be allowed to enforce its near total abortion ban while the state appeals a judge’s ruling that struck down the law.
The latest decision by District Judge Bruce Romanick means that, for now, his September ruling stands while the state appeals it to the North Dakota Supreme Court.
No abortion clinics have operated in North Dakota since the Red River Women’s Clinic moved from Fargo to nearby Moorhead, Minnesota, in 2022. The move came after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, triggering a North Dakota law that would have automatically banned most abortions. The statute was about to take effect when the clinic sued to stop it.
North Dakota’s abortion ban made performing the procedure a felony. The only exceptions were to prevent the mother’s death or a “serious health risk” to her. In cases of rape or incest, a patient could secure an abortion up to six weeks of gestation, which is before some people realize they are pregnant.
“The Court has found the law unconstitutional under the state constitution,” Romanick said. “It would be non-sensical for this Court to keep a law it has found to be unconstitutional in effect pending appeal.”
The newest decision is important because it means people with serious pregnancy complications who go to hospitals seeking medical care don’t have to worry about their treatment being delayed under the law, said Meetra Mehdizadeh, staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, who also is an attorney for the plaintiffs.
“It just makes pregnancy safer for everyone to know that if that does happen, they will have the option of being able to seek that care in-state and won’t have to worry that their doctors are going to feel forced to delay care or that their doctors are not going to be able to provide standard-of-care treatment because of the law,” she said.
Last month, the judge found North Dakota’s abortion ban unconstitutionally vague, and ruled that pregnant women in the state have a fundamental right to abortion before a fetus is viable outside the womb.
The state plans to appeal that September ruling.
A text message was sent to North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley Thursday seeking comment about whether the state would also appeal Romanick’s most recent decision.
The judge heard arguments Thursday morning from attorneys representing the state and the abortion rights plaintiffs, including the women’s clinic and several physicians.
In court, Special Assistant Attorney General Dan Gaustad said the September ruling raises questions and creates confusion about what it means for dozens of state’s attorneys not named in the lawsuit and for other district court judges.
“Let’s let the North Dakota Supreme Court decide this issue and let the law remain in place like it has been,” Gaustad said.
Melissa Rutman, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the state hadn’t met the requirements to stay the ruling that struck down the abortion ban.
“The court already concluded that there is confusion if the law is in effect because as a matter of law, the law is too vague on its face to afford doctors due process rights, and physicians are forced to guess whether their medical decisions will subject them to criminal liability,” she said.
The judge also said his previous order and judgment “are not confusing.”
veryGood! (4219)
Related
- Sam Taylor
- New Zealand mother convicted of killing her 3 young daughters
- Ban on gender-affirming care for minors takes effect in North Carolina after veto override
- Thousands lost power in a New Jersey town after an unexpected animal fell on a transformer
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Ban on gender-affirming care for minors takes effect in North Carolina after veto override
- U.S. jobless claims applications fall as labor market continues to show resiliency
- Oklahoma Supreme Court will consider Tulsa Race Massacre reparations case
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Foes of Biden’s Climate Plan Sought a ‘New Solyndra,’ but They Have yet to Dig Up Scandal
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Contract talks continue nearly 2 months into strike at Pennsylvania locomotive plant
- How 5th Circuit Court of Appeals mifepristone ruling pokes holes in wider FDA authority
- Federal appeals court upholds block of Idaho transgender athletes law
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Water managers warn that stretches of the Rio Grande will dry up without more rain
- Activists campaign for shackled elderly zoo elephants to be released in Vietnam
- Judge who signed Kansas newspaper search warrant had 2 DUI arrests, reports say
Recommendation
Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
Maui fire survivor blindly headed toward Lahaina blaze: Fear and panic that I have never experienced before
'Massacre': Police investigate quadruple homicide involving 3 children in Oklahoma City
Thousands lost power in a New Jersey town after an unexpected animal fell on a transformer
Average rate on 30
Standards Still Murky for Disposing Oilfield Wastewater in Texas Rivers
Aldi says it will buy 400 Winn-Dixie, Harveys groceries across the southern U.S.
New Zealand mother convicted of killing her 3 young daughters